Climate Change Is Natural & Cyclical

Categories: Editorials & Commentary

I haven’t commented on ClimateGate because I felt it was more important to focus on the factors that influence climate and weather, the formation of the IPCC, and this new carbon exchange system. Although ClimateGate is certainly compelling, it’s a blip on the screen of a global takeover – and that, dear readers, is where the action is.

This morning, I watched a video on YouTube featuring White House press secretary Robert Gibbs. Journalists asked him about the hacked emails that set off ClimateGate and the reason why thousands of scientists reject the official climate change story. Of course, he handled the press the way the White House always does – by dismissing and deflecting any questions that required an honest answer.

I wasn’t particularly disturbed by the predictable dismissal and redirection process, nor was I shocked by the way they stonewalled the journalists who refused to play ball. I expect that kind of gross imbalance and inequity from the executive office, whereby the stroke of a pen renders the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and other integral foundational documents null and void. (I’m referring to Executive Orders, international treaties, and any other edicts that have to do with legal standing.)

Robert Gibbs had full support to declare that there is no scientific basis for disputing the official climate change story. See for yourself @ 2:20.

I can think of two things that truly have no basis in science: a carbon exchange designed by people who designed, delivered, and manage the derivatives market, and an international monitoring and enforcement organization that is accountable to NO ONE.

The emerging carbon industrial complex is riddled with conflicts of interest. The mainstream media is acting as a source of public misinformation around the clock. I recommend avoiding the major stations altogether. They are brainwashing entire populations – and, to add insult to injury, indoctrinating our children for generations to come. Please, turn off your television sets. Don’t watch these fake news stations.

If anything that I have covered is true and verifiable, it is that the global warming planetary emergency scare is a false declaration and an obvious global agenda that has nothing to do with sustainability. It has no business masquerading under the guise of “climate change” as if climate change hasn’t been occurring naturally for literally millions of years. Nobody is disputing the existence of climate change because it is always happening. This is a false argument.

The global dispute over climate change has to do with…

  • Falsifying legitimate science and declaring it irrelevant
  • Obstructing the scientific process
  • Bullying, slandering, and firing professionals who refuse to toe the line
  • Inventing a carbon trading scheme to establish a new international industrial complex that makes trillions of dollars and monitors everyone on earth
  • Omitting critical information to prevent the public from viewing the issue on a whole-systems level
  • Using photo ops and images of earth changes to scare people into immediate action
  • Mass brainwashing by invoking fear over impending doom
  • Indoctrinating people to believe that cyclical events in Earth’s history and the role of the sun are irrelevant, and that climate change is an issue we can “solve”
  • Creating a mock campaign so pervasive that people will not question the official story for fear of ridicule or marginalization
    • Our Nobel Peace Prize-winning president has publicly voiced condescending remarks such as, “We will deal with them”. “Them” includes you, me, and anyone else who does not accept the distorted official story about global warming and climate change, which has been systematically presented out of context.
  • Using public figures to promote the official story in order to increase peer pressure, conformity, and mass acceptance
  • Painting dissenting voices as “flat-earthers”, “moon-landing deniers”, or “conspiracy theorists” – as if real conspiracies have never existed
  • Deceiving people who love the planet and respect life
  • Marginalizing the skeptics
  • Policy makers who run from or deflect honest dialogue

Climate change is an insidious agenda that operates below conscious awareness. Cyclical climate change is not in dispute: it is nothing more than the repackaging of the global warming agenda. Watch the action surrounding this topic if you want to see the biggest conspiracy of the century unfolding before your very eyes. Now is the time to see clearly.

3 comments… add one
  • Tony Dec 26, 2009 @ 21:21

    Yes, climactic changes have happened ever since this planet has been here. These changes are measured in geological time, in periods that last thousands if not millions of years. This is the problem. Our climate is beginning to change so abruptly and dramatically. To argue that the behavior of man does not play a significant role in this upheaval and to refuse to evaluate his consumption patterns as a variable in this matrix is absolutely absurd.

    That being said, I am just as disgusted as a great many people about the proposed solutions to this problem. It’s all talk and little action.

    If I may put on my tinfoil hat, it would appear that the privileged understand that our resources cannot support all our population and they simply want cataclysm to occur so that in the end a select few can enjoy life afterward while the many perish. That’s my conspiracy theory.

  • Bill Jan 2, 2010 @ 9:50

    Tony, I have a horrible suspicion that you could be right about the desire for a ‘cataclysm’. I recently heard a British politician say in a TV interview, “Well, we’ve got to get the climate under control.” It should be obvious to anyone that governments have as much chance of controlling the climate as they have of controlling the speed of the earth’s rotation.

    People, of course, are much easier to control.

  • John Jan 5, 2010 @ 23:37

    What evidence does Tony have that any climate change (read” global warming) we may or may not be undergoing is abrupt and dramatic? Is it based on legitimate data collection and recorded observations, or rather on sensational news coverage or parties with an axe to grind?

    What evidence is there that any such climate change has to do with anything other than natural solar cycles, cloud cover, changes in geomagnetic patterns, or any other natural long-term cyclic causes? What evidence is there that anthropomorphic global warming (AGW) is real, or that any activities of man have any significant impact on the climate? What evidence is ther that they may not?

    What indication is there that anything mankind can do will possibly have any noticeable impact on climate change?

    Opinions are like assholes—everybody’s got one, and most of them stink. Only objective data—data that has not been corrupted or otherwise changed to support a specific thesis—properly analyzed statistically can be relied upon.

    Lord Monckton and others have:

    a) Used such data to refute the AGW proposition

    b) Demonstrated that climate change is a natural phenomenon, and

    c) Provided credible argument that the global climate “crisis” is the stalking horse for a completely different politico-economic agenda

    d) Provided evidence that the so-called “consensus on settled science” is really the fortress mentality of a relatively small group of so-called scientists of one mind, who peer review each other’s work but permit no neutral, outside review. And their position rests on both flawed data and a relatively small number of studies (four, I think) all written and peer reviewd by themselves.

    As Lord Monckton says, “Don’t take my word for it. Search out and examine the data for yourself.”

Your Comments and Feedback are Very Important to us.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.